Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Wolf Kirchmeir (wwolfkir_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 03/13/05
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:25:56 -0500
Albert Wagner wrote:
> Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
> <snip>
>
>> Not accuracy, precision.
>
>
> OK, Wolf. What are the mathematiker's definitions of accuracy and
> precision that makes them so different?
I'm referring to the engineering concepts. You know those, if you really
did get an engineering training, as you claim. An engineering
_education_ seems to have passed you by.
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|