Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/13/05
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Gabriel's AFD - March 11,2005"
- Previous message: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Continuous differentiation"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:40:56 GMT
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:48:19 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>> Quantum mechanics is necessary. Quantum postulates are not a
>> mechanics.
>
>The mathematics along with its interpretations ARE the theory.
I didn't say they weren't a theory, Bob, as you damn well can read for
yourself by now. I said they weren't a mechanics. They don't explain
quantum postulates and observations in terms of each other or Planck's
constant. Shape up or ship out.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Gabriel's AFD - March 11,2005"
- Previous message: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Continuous differentiation"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
