Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer
cafeinst_at_msn.com
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Next in thread: Alec McKenzie: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Alec McKenzie: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Don Taylor: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Mar 2005 13:23:18 -0800
Pubkeybreaker wrote:
> "Since PRIMES is in P, it would seem logical that FACTORING should
also
> be in P."
>
> Huh? Logical? By whose logic? Please explain this 'logic'.
>
>
>
> " Algorithms for determining whether a number is prime always
> work by indirectly or directly checking whether it has factors or
not"
>
> This is just a re-wording of the problem. A number is not prime if it
> has
> a prime factor less than itself. So what? How does this
demonstrate
> a
> relation between prime proving and factoring?
>
> " It would seem that there should be a way to fine-tune the poly-time
> AKS PRIMES algorithm"
>
> 'Seem"? Seem how? please explain your reasoning. It doesn't seem
so
> to
> me and I am an expert in this subject.
>
> Why do you think that AKS has anything to do with factoring? Explain
> your reasoning.
As I predicted, there would be some people who would strongly disagree.
All I was doing was stating an opinion that would seem to be correct
reasoning to an outsider. I never said it was correct reasoning nor do
I know whether it is correct.
I mean "If one can determine that a number is composite in poly-time,
one should also be able to determine its factors in poly-time, since
the factors are what determine whether the number is composite or not."
Can anyone present a convincing argument, through perhaps a
counterexample, that this way of thinking is misguided?
Craig
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Next in thread: Alec McKenzie: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Alec McKenzie: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Don Taylor: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|