Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6
bill-deja_at_weacca.com
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: bill-deja_at_weacca.com: "Re: How to attack this without Sylow's thm"
- Previous message: Ibn.Qirtaiba_at_gmail.com: "graphs of the regular polytopes"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: Jim Heckman: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Mar 2005 04:54:29 -0800
I am looking for a reasonably elementary proof that a simple group of
order 360 must have order 360. I have proven all sorts of things
about the Sylow subgroups, their normalizers, and their intersections;
but I haven't stumbled across anything that gives me the result.
I suspect that it might be fruitful to take a Sylow 5 subgroup P. Its
normalizer contains 5 elements of order 2. Take one of them. It
also belongs to a subgroup H of G isomorphic to A_4. If we could show
that PH is not all of G, we would be done.
Another approach might be to somehow use the fact that if H acts on G's
Sylow 5 subgroups by conjugation then Orbit(P) is of order 6, most
plausibly by somehow using this fact to partition the Sylow 5 subgroups
into 6 sets of 6, and then having G somehow act on these. Each
approach is believable because it's easy to make it work in A_6 itself.
But I cannot see how to get either of them to work.
Any hints would be appreciated --- either on how to make one of these
ideras work out --- or on some other approach.
BTW, the subgroups of order 12 are interesting. Some of them clearly
correspond to two pint stabilizers, e.g. the one generated by (123) and
(12)(34) clearly stabilizes 4 and 5; but I don't know what to make of
the other ones, e.g. the one generated by
(12)(34) and (135)(246).
Bill.
- Next message: bill-deja_at_weacca.com: "Re: How to attack this without Sylow's thm"
- Previous message: Ibn.Qirtaiba_at_gmail.com: "graphs of the regular polytopes"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Reply: Jim Heckman: "Re: Help proving that a simple group of order 360 must be isomorphic to A_6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|