Re: topology and compact sets
From: Zdislav V. Kovarik (kovarik_at_mcmaster.ca)
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Dave Rusin: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:13:13 -0500
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Dave Rusin wrote:
> In article <SbXZd.396$0O.329@fe51.usenetserver.com>,
> Igor Khavkine <igor.kh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is your set {x in X : f(x) leq c} open or closed?
>
> The teacher in me insists that you phrase your hint something like,
>
> > Is your set {x in X : f(x) leq c} open? Or closed? Or... ?
>
> No sense reinforcing a common misunderstanding.
> dave
Is the set ajar?...:-)=
Cheers, ZVK(Slavek)
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Dave Rusin: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: topology and compact sets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]