Re: Publication not so important in mathematics

From: Michael J Hardy (mjhardy_at_mit.edu)
Date: 03/18/05


Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:48:12 GMT

jstevh@msn.com wrote:

> Those people who believe he proved Fermat's Last Theorem, probably
> believe that the publication process has something to do with that
> belief.
>
> Math people might disagree, claiming that all that scrutiny from around
> the world is really what it's about, as if he were wrong *someone*
> somewhere in the world would speak up and holler about the error.
>
> I say they wouldn't necessarily, as the system is broken.

With most publications, an error might escape notice for a
long time, maybe even if it was fatal to the idea of the paper.
But in Wiles, case, such a huge number of mathematicians took
such great interest in understanding it that I suspect if there
were a serious error, someone would have said something.

> Now for those of you who are still wondering, the issue here is that
> math folks have basically been admitting that they don't necessarily
> count publication of a paper in math journal for much, with the poster
> I'm replying to claiming that the purpose of publication is not to show
> correctness, but to get people acquainted with the material, and to
> help academics build up their publications, basically for their
> careers.
>
> My point is that for some of you that might be a surprise.

Maybe to _you_ that's a surpise. But I'd have thought common
sense alone would suggest that the main purpose of publication
is to make the ideas in a paper known to whoever is interested.

-- Mike Hardy



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Publication not so important in mathematics
    ... >> I wonder if you misunderstand the purpose of publication. ... >> Which basically is saying that math people believe that it's all ... > But I said the MAIN purpose is to acquaint readers with the material. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... So publication in a peer reviewed math journal is not such a context? ... leading mathematician at my alma mater Vanderbilt University where I ... There is no way to convince you people, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The problem of "premature publicity" for maths popularizers
    ... others (including math Ph.D.s, math. ... And what can be said about possible damages? ... community for Rourke, Stewart, ... out what provable damages followed the publication ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... So publication in a peer reviewed math journal is not such a context? ... leading mathematician at my alma mater Vanderbilt University where I ... Publication in a peer reviewed math journal meant absolutely NOTHING to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The problem of "premature publicity" for maths popularizers
    ... others (including math Ph.D.s, math. ... out what provable damages followed the publication ... Among mathematicians, Rourke was widely ridiculed but Stewart wasn't. ...
    (sci.math)