Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer
tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: pgiacome_at_gmail.com: "Percolation RAN"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Next in thread: Jean-Marc Bourguet: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Jean-Marc Bourguet: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Mar 2005 14:03:50 GMT
In article <1111102453.493559.44940@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Craig Feinstein <cafeinst@msn.com> wrote:
>as the fact that one can determine that there are factors without
>constructively calculating the factors is, what I would call, surprising.
A great deal of attention has been given to this "surprising" phenomenon
of "non-constructive proofs." In some situations there are proofs that
something exists without there being *any* algorithm, however inefficient,
to find it. For example, one can prove that the rank of an elliptic curve
over Q is finite, but there is no known algorithm to compute the rank. Some
people find this phenomenon so disconcerting that they declare it not only
surprising but illegal, and they reject the logical principle (the law of
the excluded middle) on which such proofs are based.
More in line with what you're talking about are situations in which there's
a proof of existence which is "constructive" in the sense that there's an
obvious brute-force algorithm to find the object of interest, but no known
*efficient* method of construction. Hex falls into that category, as does
factorization. Many proofs using the so-called "probabilistic method" of
Erdos are like this. You can find other examples in the following papers.
http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~nogaa/PDFS/nocon.pdf
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~christos/papers/On%20the%20Complexity.pdf
-- Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
- Next message: pgiacome_at_gmail.com: "Percolation RAN"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Next in thread: Jean-Marc Bourguet: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Reply: Jean-Marc Bourguet: "Re: Factoring integers on a classical computer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|