Re: FLTMA: Verification of "large zero"
From: Nathan (ntspam2_at_netscape.net)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: carkaci: "A Question About Optimization"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: DGoncz_at_aol.com: "Re: FLTMA: Verification of "large zero""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Mar 2005 07:52:08 -0800
DGoncz@aol.com wrote:
> Can anyone here verify as expected that
>
> 49^546 + 51^546 - 53^546? != 0?
This isn't just "expected"; it's proved. 546 is divisible by 3.
Do you know Euler's proof of FLT for n=3?
But never mind that for a moment. There are simpler ways to
resolve this.
1. Since you're posting to Usenet, you have access to a
computer. Why not check the arithmetic yourself?
2. Check it using a handheld calculator. Let x=51, n=546.
Then since (x+2)^n - x^n > 2nx^(n-1), if you can show that
1092 * 51^545 > 49^546 then you're done. So just use logs.
- Next message: carkaci: "A Question About Optimization"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: DGoncz_at_aol.com: "Re: FLTMA: Verification of "large zero""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|