Re: REPOST: Re: Flies in the ointment.
From: John Gabbriel (johngabbriel_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Publication not so important in mathematics"
- In reply to: denis feldmann: "Re: REPOST: Re: Flies in the ointment."
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: REPOST: Re: Flies in the ointment."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Mar 2005 08:47:33 -0800
denis feldmann wrote:
>
> Not really possible: I edited it , and it was reverted back to its
> original misleading (to say the least) version in less than one
minute.
>
> More and more JSH's like.
>
Looks like it was reverted by someone called Inter, who is probably an
admin on wikipedia. Reverting back in less than minute is most likely
an automated process!
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Publication not so important in mathematics"
- In reply to: denis feldmann: "Re: REPOST: Re: Flies in the ointment."
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: REPOST: Re: Flies in the ointment."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]