Re: Upper bounds for chromatic number
From: Butch Malahide (bof_at_sunflower.com)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Move over reality TV"
- In reply to: Thomas Heinz: "Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Next in thread: Thomas Heinz: "Re: Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Reply: Thomas Heinz: "Re: Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Mar 2005 23:09:34 -0800
> Are there any known upper bounds for the chromatic number
> of the following sets S1, S2 of undirected simple graphs?
>
> - Let c > 1 be a fixed integral constant. S1 is the set of
> graphs whose clique number is c.
When c = 2 (triangle-free graphs) the chromatic number can be
arbitrarily large. I think this is the simplest construction: For a
given positive integer n > 2, consider the graph with vertex set
{(x,y): x and y integers, 1 <= x < y <= n}; (x,y) is adjacent to (u,v)
if u = y or v = x. The chromatic number is the least k such that 2^k >=
n. This example is due to Erdos and Hajnal, if I remember right.
- Next message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Move over reality TV"
- In reply to: Thomas Heinz: "Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Next in thread: Thomas Heinz: "Re: Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Reply: Thomas Heinz: "Re: Upper bounds for chromatic number"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|