Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw
From: Lasse (lasse_rempe_at_yahoo.de)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Counting primes, my way versus others"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Some Simple Questions"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Next in thread: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Reply: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Reply: Matt Gutting: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Mar 2005 06:24:35 -0800
>
> You are not rational people.
>
But are 'they' (whoever this refers to) algebraic people?
Transcendental people? Diophantine people? Liouville people? Bryuno
people? Algebraic integer people?
(Of course the answer is: none of the above. They are 'object people'.)
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Counting primes, my way versus others"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Some Simple Questions"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Next in thread: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Reply: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Reply: Matt Gutting: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]