Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw
From: Giuseppe Bilotta (bilotta78_at_hotpop.com)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lasse: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Next in thread: Matt Gutting: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:51:34 +0100
Lasse wrote:
> But are 'they' (whoever this refers to) algebraic people?
> Transcendental people? Diophantine people? Liouville people? Bryuno
> people? Algebraic integer people?
>
> (Of course the answer is: none of the above. They are 'object people'.)
ROTFL.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
(Roger Waters)
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lasse: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Next in thread: Matt Gutting: "Re: JSH: How easy? Wiles's work's flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|