Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Grass: "what IS inverted category theory???"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:02:29 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote:
> Dave Seaman wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:30:49 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote:
>>
>>>Basically, Dave, we simply don't like your definitions. And it
>>>being a fact that you have no legal protection nor moral high
>>>ground for your definitions we are free to make up any we like
>>>better. The consensus of those who erroneous believe that they
>>>have a patent on numbers and their use carries no weight with
>>>everyone else. Mathematics is a commons, public property. e.g.
>>>cardinality has to do with redness, nothing more.
>>
>>
>> You have every right to make up your own definitions, but I notice that you
>> have ducked the question yet again. I asked what your definition is. No
>> reply.
> That's because it wasn't me that you asked.
You said "we don't like your definitions", so I thought you were speaking
for the group.
Never mind, I am asking you now. For you and for anyone else who claims
"number of elements" does not mean "cardinality": What is your
definition of "number of elements"?
-- Dave Seaman Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. <http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Grass: "what IS inverted category theory???"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|