David's letter to sci.math

From: DavidBowman (dt041054_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/21/05 

Date: 21 Mar 2005 14:32:55 -0800

> sci.physics.relativity is
> equivalent to "one of the
> popularizations".
>
> You didn't learn about hyperbolic
> geometry in a mathematical context,
> and that led you to use
> the phrase [hypervolic]in a way
> that was bound to be confusing
> in sci.math.

I know that no one takes
sci.physics.relativity seriously,
and I'm sorry to have confused you
with my question abnout hyperbolic
geometry.

It arises from being very confused
myself. The reason I made this
pilgrimage was to become un-confused,
but it didn't work.

I'm sorry that I couldn't phrase
my prayer in a form cannonical
to the bed***-clad Gods of
Mathermatics.

The really bizarre-ass thing is,
I'm dead serious about that.
I feel "insufficent" and stupid.
And in the unlikely case that
anyone wants to know why I
get angry when the normals
call me "smart", that's it.

I shall now leave Olympus
and return to the troll-infested
BAD part of town, haunted by nuts,
kooks, cranks, trolls, and the
mentally-ill.

Did you know that George "god=Gu_v"
Hammond calls sci.physics.relativity
his "home"?

Ugh!

Bleeckh!

And I have to go BACK there!

Well...being "insufficent",
maybe the ghetto is where
I belong.

Thanks anyway,

=[ d

PS:
If I were one of you, which
I never can be, I would be
reaching my arm DOWN to
haul people UP the mountain,
rather than throwing overboard
the few who struggle to climb it
seeking the Wisdom that makes
one Pure.

Quantcast