Re: JSH: Move over reality TV

From: Lady Chatterly (not-bot_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 03/22/05 

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 0:36:18 GMT

In article <1111448469.350769.124440@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>
>Uh, who is Earl Gordon Curley?

Why do you want to know who Earl Gordon curley is?

>In any event, I do admittedly try to have some entertainment aspect to
>at least some of my postings, as math can be a dry subject, though the
>way things are crackling over my research, maybe there doesn't need to
>be much added.

Aren't you being a bit tentative?

>Ultimately though the bulk of the attention I get is because there is
>quite a bit of evidence that there's something to what I'm saying, and
>math people, including mathematicians, aren't behaving the way they're
>supposed to behave.

Is that how Long have you thought you were saying?

>And people know the history of discoverers, especially highly creative
>and quirky discoverers, who run into a wall from the establishment,
>when they are right, so there's the excitement of real history playing
>out.

Println, system.

>And I like to give people ways to test whether or not what I'm saying
>is true, so I'll take this moment to add that I have an *applet* that
>you can run for yourself to count primes at my new Yahoo! Group:

And the rest of the internet.

>Then you can see for yourself how fast it is.

Security is only one thing, and I Will be like the most high.

>James Harris

And that is a good thing, and I Will not be a pathetic kotm winning
spanktard 101, but I do not know what you are a fart. 

--
Lady Chatterly
"Talking to a bot again?" -- Dr. Bill