Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder
From: gerard46 (gerard46_at_rtt.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: inner products, vector norms and matrix norms"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:37:17 GMT
| Lynn Kurtz wrote:
|> John Smith wrote:
|>Jumbie wrote:
|>> Factor this:
|>>
|>> 8473865710237493723946198263649821976398469181345623
|>>
|> 2360209087377863 * 23196547792409844187
| I don't think so, since the least significant digit of the product is
| wrong.
I suppose rounding is just plain out of the question ? Does it
really have to come out to the last digit? hee hee heh. _______Gerard S.
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: inner products, vector norms and matrix norms"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
