Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH
From: karllarc (karllarc_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: karllarc: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Randy Poe: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Larry Lard: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Mar 2005 16:58:51 -0800
Here is the link.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7180&feedId=online-news_rss20
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: karllarc: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Randy Poe: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Reply: Larry Lard: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
