Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:28:03 -0500
Allan C Cybulskie wrote:
>
> People generally do not find thinking about 1/64th of something useful
> without a reference. That was my point.
The fractions are equal. That is enough of a reference. 1/64 of a pinto
is the same as 1/32 of a cup. Simple arithmetic.
Bob Kolker
>
>
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
