Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Allan C Cybulskie (allan.c.cybulskie_at_yahoo.ca)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:27:52 -0500
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3a97lqF6aptm6U2@individual.net...
>
>
> Allan C Cybulskie wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, physical examination only reveals physical things. What a
remarkable
> > revelation ... I hope discovering that didn't tax your mind too much ...
>
> Fine, now specify an objective non-physical way human being A can
> examine human being B (A != B) for a mind?
You can't. You also can't do it physically either. This is a result that
gives the implication that mind is not physical in the same way as other
things are because we have direct access to our own minds without physical
intervention.
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
