Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder
From: flip (flip_alpha_at_safebunch.com)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Previous message: Timothy Murphy: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Reply: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:00:59 -0800
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1111447597.041641.84770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Part of the reason I find myself still focusing on a sign variation on
> my earlier quadratics is that I can easily get to a surprising
> relation.
>
Is that you still want to pull a solution out of your ass without having any
idea of where the hell you are heading.
How about you get your head out of your ass and move on to the millenium
problems.
I am also surprised that you continue to try and force your lies and deceit
upon the unknowing.
I think you should become a drug dealer since you have an aptitude for this
sort of behavior!
- Next message: John Schutkeker: "Re: Wow , somebody actually made a new breakthrough in math, and it wasn't JSH"
- Previous message: Timothy Murphy: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Reply: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|