Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:51:56 -0600
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> Albert Wagner <albertwagner@cox.net> writes:
>
>
>>You seem to be a one-trick pony, Torkel. Unfortunately, all you
>>have accomplished with that one trick is to create a new, if
>>nonsensical, cliche'.
>
>
> "Nonsensical"? Well, if you have come to regard fnoffling as
> nonsensical, why not seek greener pastures?
I did so seek but my pastures were invaded. I only subscribe to
alt.philosophy.meta. Where are you posting from?
-- "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." - -- Tolstoy
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|