Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder
From: Randy Poe (poespam-trap_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: david bandel: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 07:30:30 -0800
flip wrote:
> <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1111447597.041641.84770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > Part of the reason I find myself still focusing on a sign variation
on
> > my earlier quadratics is that I can easily get to a surprising
> > relation.
> >
> How about you get your head out of your ass and move on to the
millenium
> problems.
I think he already solved them. I think he said that
his prime-counting algorithm can "probably" prove the
Riemann hypothesis.
- Randy
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: david bandel: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
