Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:19:35 -0500
Albert Wagner wrote:
>
> OK. No argument. My objections would only become relevant when your
> 'good working theory' is applied to reality, where there are no infinities.
Application to reality (i.e. physical reality) is not a requirement for
a mathematical theory. The only requirement is internal (logical)
consistency.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
