Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:48:58 -0500
stephen@nomail.com wrote:
> They various definitions proposed for "circle" have
> been very weak and supposed all sorts of other definitions
> such as "motion", "line", "rate" and required myriad
> assumptions about how those words are defined.
The concept of sets is buried in each of the above. Or at least any of
the above notions can be expressed in terms of sets.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- In reply to: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]