Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Mar 2005 22:37:18 GMT
In sci.math Jesse F. Hughes <jesse@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
: stephen@nomail.com writes:
:> I would like to see an example of a definition as defined by the
:> philosophers.
: The various folks posting from comp.ai.philosophy and
: sci.philosophy.meta are philosophers in the same sense that James
: S. Harris is a mathematician and Ross Finlayson a logician.
It was not my intention to insult any real philosophers.
I was thinking of calling them philosuffers but that would
be childish. :) I was trying philosophs for awhile, because
for some strange reason they think uncapitalized German is
insulting.
Stephen
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading