Re: Limit
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: sci.math.research via google groups down?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: David's letter to sci.math"
- Maybe in reply to: José Carlos Santos: "Re: Limit"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Limit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:40:47 -0600
On 24 Mar 2005 02:45:36 -0800, sweet_sorrow30@yahoo.com (TT) wrote:
>a,b > 0 .
>
>Please evaluate lim{ [(a^(1/k) + b^(1/k)]/2 }^k as k goes to infinite.
That would be sqrt(ab).
Note that
e^t = 1 + t + E(t),
where |E(t)/t^2| is bounded for |t| <= 1.
Also note that
log(1+t) = t + L(t),
where |L(t)/t^2| is bounded for |t| <= 1/2.
Assume that ab = 1 (when you hand this in make certain
to explain why it's legal to assume this.) Then
log(a) + log(b) = 0, hence
(a^(1/k) + b^(1/k)]/2 = (xp(log(a)/k) + exp(log(b)/k))/2
= 1 + H(k),
where |H(k)|<= c/k^2. So
log([(a^(1/k) + b^(1/k)]/2 }^k)
= k log(H(k)),
hence
|log([(a^(1/k) + b^(1/k)]/2 }^k)| <= ck/k^2
for large k.
>Thanks!
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: sci.math.research via google groups down?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: David's letter to sci.math"
- Maybe in reply to: José Carlos Santos: "Re: Limit"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Limit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]