sci.math

• Date Index

---

• Re: Works in Progress, Lawrence House
• Partitions & equivalence relations, aaaaaaaaaaa
  • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, Lawrence House
    • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, Virgil
• Another Quad. Residue question, mathedman
• Finding a minimal cost tree for the network, Bob
• Q for readers of Russian., Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Q for readers of Russian., Rick Decker
• JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
    • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, C. Bond
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Nora Baron
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Lash Rambo
    • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Virgil
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Tim Peters
• Question about integer partitions, neuron
  • Re: Question about integer partitions, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Question about integer partitions, neuron
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, neuron
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, Tim Peters
• Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Warren
  • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Rusty
    • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Warren
      • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Lee Rudolph
• Infinite, ligriv
  • Re: Infinite, Justin Young
  • Re: Infinite, William Elliot
  • Re: Infinite, Virgil
    • Re: Infinite, Ross A. Finlayson
• September (was, Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 214)), Lee Rudolph
• Pyramid Edges, ontadian
  • Re: Pyramid Edges, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Minimum triangle area, ontadian
• Continuity and Differentiation, William Elliot
  • Re: Continuity and Differentiation, Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: Continuity and Differentiation, David C . Ullrich
• Complex Function Graphics for Mathematica, David Park
• Another Rational Canonical forms question.., Tony
• Fractional part, amalfi
  • Re: Fractional part, Nathan
  • Re: Fractional part, Dik T. Winter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fractional part, amalfi
• Who know nonlinear regression gamma?, Claudia
• Who knows nonlinear regression gamma?, Claudia
• nonlinear regression gamma, Claudia
• Extensions of continuous linear functions, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, José Carlos Santos
• Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, mathedman
  • Re: Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Gib Bogle
• mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Gib Bogle
• complex integral, mark12345
  • Re: complex integral, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: complex integral, achava
• Points in a sphere, ontadian
  • Re: Points in a sphere, Chip Eastham
• Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
  • Re: Shift operator in l^2, A N Niel
    • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Robert Israel
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
• need help :(, Evolution
  • Re: need help :(, A N Niel
  • Re: need help :(, Coach
    • Re: need help :(, Evolution
• How log comes into math?, gimmytang
  • Re: How log comes into math?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: How log comes into math?, Lawrence House
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: How log comes into math?, xmp
      • Re: How log comes into math?, Anthony Buckland
      • Re: How log comes into math?, Wayne Brown
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Gib Bogle
• quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., Emme
  • Re: quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., Robert Israel
  • Re: quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., cacak5
• How does this maths "trick" work?, Cylindric
  • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, Risto Lankinen
    • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, Cylindric
  • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, G.E. Ivey
• need help solving this, Alain Verghote
• (Reply) Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
• compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
    • Re: compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Robin Chapman
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Robin Chapman
• Where do I begin?, analysisman
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Where do I begin?, HERC777
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
    • Re: Where do I begin?, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Where do I begin?, A N Niel
  • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Where do I begin?, William Elliot
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, William Elliot
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Where do I begin?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Where do I begin?, A N Niel
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
    • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
      • Re: Where do I begin?, analysisman
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Peter
    • Re: Where do I begin?, analysisman
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Charlie
• Tridiagonal matrices, Eric
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Tridiagonal matrices, Eric
    • Re: Tridiagonal matrices, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Integral, Opiate
  • Re: Integral, Proginoskes
    • Re: Integral, DP
  • Re: Integral, alain verghote
• Rational Canonical forms question...., Tony
• discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: discrete mathematics, Proginoskes
  • Re: discrete mathematics, flip
  • Re: discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
• Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
  • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
  • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., Ted Hwa
    • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
      • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
• JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Nathan
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, flip
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, bryant_j_j
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, C. Bond
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, Richard Henry
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, headly
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Nora Baron
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Tim Peters
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Wayne Brown
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, W. Dale Hall
• need help solving this., ames_kin@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving this., Gerry Myerson
  • Re: need help solving this., Torsten Hennig
    • Re: need help solving this., ames_kin@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving this., alain verghote
• correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, NoName NoSlogan
  • Re: correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, Gerry Myerson
• Conditionally convergent series, Amanda
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Conditionally convergent series, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Lawrence House
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Amanda
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Robert Israel
• Ever hear of this -- it's not homework, michael_bennettxyz
  • Re: Ever hear of this -- it's not homework, Daniel W. Johnson
• Point in a sphere, ontadian
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Point in a sphere, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Ed van der Meulen
• F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Daniel W. Johnson
    • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
      • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Keith A. Lewis
• Re: Why do we have the natural numbers?, Lawrence House
• Hilbert Scmidt norm need help with proof, egilbae
  • Re: Hilbert Scmidt norm need help with proof, The World Wide Wade
• Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, fishfry
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, ken quirici
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
• convergence of functions and inverses, beebee
  • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, beebee
      • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, Dave Rusin
• SDE-Vasicek Modell-Solution, 1webpanter
• rank & eigenvalues, tamiry
  • Re: rank & eigenvalues, Alois Steindl
    • Re: rank & eigenvalues, tamiry
      • Re: rank & eigenvalues, Alois Steindl
• Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Mike H
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, fishfry
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Toni Lassila
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Hero
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, examachine
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Ioannis
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, William Elliot
  • Phenomena and noumena, Mike H
    • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Rainer Rosenthal
• Good reduction of Jacobians of twisted Fermat curves, Thomas
  • Re: Good reduction of Jacobians of twisted Fermat curves, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• JSH: SFT is boring, N. Silver
  • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, N. Silver
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Larry Hammick
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Lash Rambo
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Larry Hammick
• Back Online, Webmanneken
  • Re: Back Online, William Elliot
• matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
  • matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Alois Steindl
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Randy Poe
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Randy Poe
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Torsten Hennig
• a matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
• Correct proof involving relation theorem?, A. Boom
  • Re: Correct proof involving relation theorem?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Correct proof involving relation theorem?, A. Boom
• Your account #3M7888, "Adrian Corbin"
• Finite Groups Book, Tonico
• Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas, Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Jesse F. Hughes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Lee Rudolph
• nested closed set theorem for R^n, vsgdp
  • Re: nested closed set theorem for R^n, Stuart M Newberger
• Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
  • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Hagen
    • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
• Re: National security, Tim Peters
• Linear algebra question, Eric
  • Re: Linear algebra question, Virgil
• Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, A. Boom
  • Re: Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, Ted Hwa
    • Re: Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, A. Boom
• Re: SF: National security, Justin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: SF: National security, Tim Peters
      • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: SF: National security, Proginoskes
• Re: SF: Symmetry, practical matters, social realities, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: SF: Symmetry, practical matters, social realities, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Every square integrable function has integral representation?, mathlover
  • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, William Elliot
    • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, G. A. Edgar
• difficult problems for us mathematicians., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: difficult problems for us mathematicians., A. Boom
• Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
      • Re: Types of functions and relations, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, James Buddenhagen
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
• sequence of continuous functions, Tim
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, William Elliot
    • Re: sequence of continuous functions, Tim
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, William Elliot
• Continuity, Tim
  • Re: Continuity, William Elliot
  • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Continuity, Tim
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, Tim
      • Re: Continuity, Ted Hwa
      • Re: Continuity, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, William Elliot
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
• good text for linear algebra?, mk
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robert Israel
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, xmp
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robert Israel
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, denis feldmann
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?,
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, David C . Ullrich
• Strength of Sub-division question., Drew Jones
  • Re: Strength of Sub-division question., achava
    • Re: Strength of Sub-division question., Drew Jones
• proofs question, Island11111
  • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: proofs question, Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Peter L. Montgomery
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
  • Re: proofs question, hale
• How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
  • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Carl K. Woll
    • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
      • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
• Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, gerard46
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Barry Schwarz
• Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
  • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
      • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
• Probability question, Brett Trost
  • Re: Probability question, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: Probability question, Tino
  • Re: Probability question, Tomas Hokenberi
  • Re: Probability question, Peter L. Montgomery
• A link between the Goldbach Conjecture, Riemann's Zeta function and Dirichlet's Functions, davecornwell
• Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
    • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32,
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
    • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
• Primitive roots and squares, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Primitive roots and squares, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Primitive roots and squares, Hanford Carr
• Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Tim Peters
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jankrihau
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Proginoskes
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Tim Peters
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Rick Decker
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, David Kastrup
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
• JSH: SFT and integers, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, bryant_j_j
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Larry Lard
  • Re: SFT and integers, N. Silver
  • Re: SFT and integers, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Justin
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: SFT and integers, flip
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Proginoskes
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Proginoskes
• L'Hospital for polynomes?, Hauke Reddmann
• field extension, Andreas Thom
  • Re: field extension, rupertmccallum
• Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
  • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Harri Haanpaa
    • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Nathan
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
• Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
  • Message not available
    • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Robert Israel
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Robert Israel
• Are k spaces compactly generated?, William Elliot
  • Re: Are k spaces compactly generated?, Zundark
• Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, iainking@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David Kastrup
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, schoenfeld1
  • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, schoenfeld1
      • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, A N Niel
  • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, alain verghote
• Re: Sword of Damocles, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sword of Damocles, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Sword of Damocles, Proginoskes
• 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Daniel Grubb
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Lee Rudolph
• Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, David Kastrup
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Justin
    • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, C. Bond
    • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, litsohate
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Wayne Brown
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Gib Bogle
• det(A - kI) = 0, vsgdp
  • Re: det(A - kI) = 0, Ryan Reich
• linear transformations, vsgdp
  • Re: linear transformations, Proginoskes
• Another question about weird differentials, Ken Honda
  • Re: Another question about weird differentials, Stuart M Newberger
• Gateaux differential help?, garrettbaird2
• Tensors without choice?, Stephen White
  • Re: Tensors without choice?, Robin Chapman
• irrationality of e, Collins Williams
  • Re: irrationality of e, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: irrationality of e, Nathan
    • Re: irrationality of e, Michael Stemper
      • Re: irrationality of e, Nathan
      • Re: irrationality of e, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: irrationality of e, Ron Sperber
  • Re: irrationality of e, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: irrationality of e, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: irrationality of e, Will Twentyman
    • Re: irrationality of e, A N Niel
      • Re: irrationality of e, r.e.s.
      • Re: irrationality of e, Will Twentyman
  • Re: irrationality of e, Christian Bau
  • Re: irrationality of e, Brian VanPelt
  • Re: irrationality of e, rich burge
  • Re: irrationality of e, david petry
• I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., flip
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Rick Decker
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., James Hess
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Daniel Ryan
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., fishfry
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Tonico
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Torkel Franzen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Torkel Franzen
• Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability 2, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, rwmm415
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Rick Decker
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, flip
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Robert Israel
• Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Virgil
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Daniel W. Johnson
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Alex Hunsley
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
• asymptotic matrix, Sami
  • Re: asymptotic matrix, Robert Israel
• Embedding of GL(n/r,q^r) into GL(n,q), s
  • Re: Embedding of GL(n/r,q^r) into GL(n,q),
• Need help for searching "error upper bound" in my circuit design problem., Liming Xiu
• An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., joenchinghkg
  • Re: An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., Lawrence House
• Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
  • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Question about sets of functions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
• Re: JSH: Refusing to Test, Fear of Failure, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: JSH: Refusing to Test, Fear of Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability, The World Wide Wade
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• family of circles question, evanmason
  • Re: family of circles question, A N Niel
• Hilbert spaces, chris
  • Re: Hilbert spaces, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Hilbert spaces, chris
      • Re: Hilbert spaces, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: Hilbert spaces, chris
• hestorical development in maths, advait.chhatre@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: hestorical development in maths, Ken Pledger
  • Re: hestorical development in maths, Jim Spriggs
• matrix proof, Robert
  • Re: matrix proof, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: matrix proof, Li Yi
• vector space of sets..., Stephen White
  • Re: vector space of sets..., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: vector space of sets..., Stephen White
  • Re: vector space of sets..., A N Niel
  • Re: vector space of sets..., Stuart M Newberger
    • Re: vector space of sets..., Stephen White
      • Re: vector space of sets..., Stuart M Newberger
• correction on calculus problem, Robert
  • Re: correction on calculus problem, Arturo Magidin
• group isomorphism problem, Li Yi
  • Re: group isomorphism problem, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: group isomorphism problem, Bart Jans
• Re: Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Milo Gardner
• Epistemology 999: Remedial was Re: Epistemology 202: Advanced Topics, Robin Chapman
• experimental data and time series analysis, paul
• an area problem, Li Yi
  • Re: an area problem, A N Niel
    • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Randy Poe
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
  • Re: an area problem, Rob Pratt
• Does a spline remain a spline after perpective projection?, Satya
  • Re: Does a spline remain a spline after perpective projection?, Rob Johnson
• Question (again) about the group of Mobius Transformations, dalthman
• calculus differential problem, Robert
  • Re: calculus differential problem, William Elliot
  • Re: calculus differential problem, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: calculus differential problem, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: calculus differential problem, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Stacking not packing, piling not tiling, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Stacking not packing, piling not tiling, The Last Danish Pastry
• Your account #913M7930, "Donnie Bellamy"
• Re: roots (zeros) of a complex function, Gabriel Cardi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: roots (zeros) of a complex function, Robert Israel
• Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., William Elliot
  • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., William Elliot
  • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., Hagen
• Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, A. Boom
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, William Elliot
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, alain verghote
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, alain verghote
• analysis proof validity, vsgdp
  • Re: analysis proof validity, Justin Young
• start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
  • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
    • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
• infinity problem, Vec
  • Re: infinity problem, William Elliot
  • Re: infinity problem, Matt Gutting
    • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
      • Re: infinity problem, Matt Gutting
      • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
  • Re: infinity problem, Li Yi
  • Re: infinity problem, DP
    • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
      • Re: infinity problem, DP
      • Re: infinity problem, Toni Lassila
    • Re: infinity problem, Tim Peters
      • Re: infinity problem, DP
  • Re: infinity problem, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: infinity problem, Dan Piponi
      • Re: infinity problem, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: infinity problem, JEMebius
• Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Nathan Gilbert
  • Re: Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Klueless
    • Re: Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Nathan Gilbert
• Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, TCL
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
    • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
    • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Robert Israel
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, G. A. Edgar
• Haar measure computations, Trav
  • Re: Haar measure computations, Herman Rubin
• MatLab randn and Simulation Step Numbers, Matthew Brenneman
• Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Mkajuma
    • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., cbrown
    • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., cbrown
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Lawrence House
• Save hundreds every month on low rates, "Graciela Kirkland"
• Basic de Rham question..., Tony
  • Re: Basic de Rham question..., Trav
• draw PDF curve, ZHANG Yan
  • Re: draw PDF curve, glenbarnett
  • Re: draw PDF curve, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: draw PDF curve, Herman Rubin
• Re: some "new" Zeta function relationships, Gerry Myerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: some "new" Zeta function relationships, G. A. Edgar
• Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, A N Niel
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, flip
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, David McAnally
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Ryan Reich
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, T Block
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Proginoskes
• Digamma on imaginary argument, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Digamma on imaginary argument, David W . Cantrell
• Localization question..., Tony
  • Re: Localization question..., Tonico
• parametrized cone, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: parametrized cone, Virgil
    • Re: parametrized cone, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: parametrized cone, john_ramsden
• Re: JSH: Image check, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Marginal Density Function (SFA, Stochastic Frontier Analysis), Andre Christ
• free math papers archive??, xmp
  • Re: free math papers archive??, David M Einstein
  • Re: free math papers archive??, Emmanuel Romeo-de Louvigny
• Proof of PID with field of fractions, jamesdickerson00
  • Re: Proof of PID with field of fractions, Arturo Magidin
• Basic set question, agapito6314
  • Re: Basic set question, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
    • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Justin Young
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Basic set question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Basic set question, agapito6314
      • Re: Basic set question,
  • Re: Basic set question, Randy Poe
  • Re: Basic set question, Virgil
  • Re: Basic set question, Owen
• geometric series and limits, jaspal
• PDE problem, Costin
  • Re: PDE problem, M.J.T. Guy
• 2 algebra questions..., Babak Arjmandnia
  • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: 2 algebra questions..., David Hartley
    • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
• definite integral question, tamiry
  • Re: definite integral question, Igor Khavkine
• dumb stupid question (sorry), aendeuryu
  • Re: dumb stupid question (sorry), Randy Poe
    • Re: dumb stupid question (sorry), aendeuryu
• FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Narasimham G.L.
  • Re: FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Chip Eastham
    • Re: FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Chip Eastham
• A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, David Kastrup
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, John H Palmieri
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity - *CORRECTION*, Matt Gutting
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity - *CORRECTION*, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Dave Seaman
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Virgil
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Hero
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Dave Seaman
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Hero
• Program to generate Pi, Fred
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, DP
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, briggs
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Program to generate Pi,
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, briggs
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, C Rode
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, DP
• Crossword clue, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Crossword clue, Rod
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Russell
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Russell
      • Re: Crossword clue, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Andy Spragg
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Crossword clue, Virgil
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, Richard Henry
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Larry Lard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
    • Re: Crossword clue, DP
  • Re: Crossword clue, G.E. Ivey
• d/dx this f please, Vec
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Ari
  • Re: d/dx this f please, William Elliot
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Heikki Kaskelma
    • Re: d/dx this f please, Matt Gutting
      • Re: d/dx this f please, Heikki Kaskelma
      • Re: d/dx this f please, Matt Gutting
  • Re: d/dx this f please, DP
• About the group of Mobius Transformations, dalthman
  • Re: About the group of Mobius Transformations, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: About the group of Mobius Transformations, Alain Verghote
• Short analysis questions, We Pretty
  • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
• Probabilities question, michael
  • Re: Probabilities question, michael
    • Re: Probabilities question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Probabilities question, michael
  • Re: Probabilities question, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Probabilities question, Rob Pratt
• One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
  • Re: One-point compactification of Q, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
  • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
    • One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, April 25, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• 7.2569463050..., mindpixel
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Proginoskes
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Brian Webb
    • Re: 7.2569463050..., Alan
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Mrs Unreliable
• Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Randall
  • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Lawrence House
    • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Randall
      • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Roman B. Binder
• Re: Two Az's, Tim Peters
• Even numbers: the sum of two multiples of exponents of two, Michelle Fry
  • Re: Even numbers: the sum of two multiples of exponents of two, Arturo Magidin
• Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, mhochster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, David Rosoff
    • Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, Dr Tomato
• Re: Why would mathematicians lie?, vsgdp
• linear algebra and DE, vsgdp
  • Re: linear algebra and DE, Ulysse Keller
• derivative, vsgdp
  • Re: derivative, Virgil
    • Re: derivative, Lynn Kurtz
• Algebra Help, Chris W
  • Re: Algebra Help, Heikki Kaskelma
• Help with a differential equation, freelancerprogrammer
  • Re: Help with a differential equation, A N Niel
    • Re: Help with a differential equation, Ron Sperber
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, A N Niel
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, Ron Sperber
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, Gerry Myerson
• READING ITERATION NOTATION QUESTION, raydpratt
• Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Mark Atherton
    • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Jesse F. Hughes
• fractal dimension, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
  • Re: fractal dimension, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: fractal dimension, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
      • Re: fractal dimension, G. A. Edgar
• Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
  • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
    • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, Arturo Magidin
• A simple (?) probability problem, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, David Hartley
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, David Hartley
• Re: differntial calculus problem #i, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: differntial calculus problem #i, puppetz
• Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Arthur B.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Alex Hunsley
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Transfer function using z transform, Thuan Seah,Tan
• Dont miss out on low rates, "Marcelino