Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: Matt Gutting <matthewdba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:33:45 -0500
In light of some of the comments in the JSH threads involving coprimeness and Z[1/2]:
If the definition of coprimeness is something like:
To say that 'p and q are coprime in a ring' is to say 'there exist a,b in the ring with ap + bq = 1'
then wouldn't 2 and 4 (or any powers of 2) be coprime in Z[1/2]? Or, more strongly, are any 2 (non-zero) rationals coprime in Q?
Or am I missing something?
Matt .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: W. Dale Hall
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Prev by Date: Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting
- Next by Date: Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra
- Previous by thread: 'Integral test'-related counterexample
- Next by thread: Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|