Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:00:31 -0800
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Matt Gutting wrote:
To say that 'p and q are coprime in a ring' is to say 'there exist a,b in the ring with ap + bq = 1'
then wouldn't 2 and 4 (or any powers of 2) be coprime in Z[1/2]? Or, more strongly, are any 2 (non-zero) rationals coprime in Q?
Or am I missing something?
You're surprise that when you go to a different country, that everything is different?
2 and 4 in Z[1/2] are units, ie have multiplicative inverse. All non-zero rationals are units in Q. In Z, the only units are +-1 and they are coprime. You have noticed all units of a ring are coprime.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- References:
- Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- From: Matt Gutting
- Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Integral test'-related counterexample
- Next by Date: Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Previous by thread: Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Next by thread: Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure
- Index(es):