n-parameter calculations in 2D
- From: "SunCode" <sol_developments@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:41:49 -0000
Any comments to this? :
First the notation used here:
A complex number:
Z = [ x.x, x.x ]
A complex number that has got a complex imaginary part:
ZiZ = [ x.x, i[ x.x, x.x ] ]
The complex imaginary part:
iZ = i[ x.x, x.x ]
Parts of Z:
[ x, y ]
Parts of ZiZ:
[ x, i[ y, z ] ]
Parts of iZ:
i[ y, z ]
Note: the iZ complex can use any number of dimensions if one likes.
To do maths on the ZiZ complex then first convert it to a normal 2D complex
where the imaginary part always is a positive real number - the absolute
value of the imaginary part of ZiZ.
Z = Z|iZ|
Or Z = [ x, |i[ y, z ]| ], same thing =)
Now you can perform normal 2D maths like Z² or sqrt(Z) and such. (Additions
and subtractions are done in ZiZ space parameter by parameter, as normally
done for n-dimensional numbers).
Then to convert the number back from Z to ZiZ then do this:
ZiZ = [ x', i[ y' * ( y / |iZ| ), y' * ( z / [iZ| ) ] ]
Note: Here x' and y' (x prim, y prim) are the x and y you did get after your
calculations in normal 2D-space . iZ, y and z are the numbers that was in
the ZiZ number before the calculations was performed.
Remember that if |ZiZ| == |x|, (if it is only a 1D real number and nothing
but) then exeptions must be made in some cases. For example in 3D the root
from a negative real number is any point on a circle in the y/z plane,
(radius = root of |x|), in 4D it is a sphear and so on.
I'm using this to create non-linear 3D fractals and it works just fine =)
Here a image of a reversed formula Julia-set IFS-fractal, (Z = sqrt( Z -
C )).
http://members.chello.se/solgrop/Set%20d%202x%20003a.jpg
Are there any errors in my system? Is this method to expand from 2-space to
n-space used before? Is this useful for something but creating stupid
fractals?
Kenneth.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cardinality question
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinality question
- Previous by thread: max-min problem
- Next by thread: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof
- Index(es):