Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- From: "Proginoskes" <proginoskes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2005 15:52:10 -0700
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
> jstevh@xxxxxxx writes:
> [...]
> > By now someone should have realized that it could work
It COULD work, but you haven't found the idea that WILL make it work. I
believe I have, and you have shown no sign in your posts that you have
found it.
> > and something, I don't know exactly what, but
> > something, should have happened.
>
> The best way to show that it could work is to show that
> *does* work. But instead you've explicitly said that
> you won't bother trying to actually apply the theorem
> and factor numbers.
And if you don't actually want to show that it can work, going to the
NSA is the exact WRONG direction to head. If you send your paper to
them and describe your "work", the first thing they'll ask is how to
implement it.
And they may give you a couple of numbers to factor right off, to see
if you're on the level.
If the NSA can't use results, they won't bother with you.
> Why do you suppose anyone else will be interested in
> your claims that the theorem *might* be useful?
Maybe because they can find the right key to unlock everything. (James
Harris seems to only want to push on a locked door.)
> > There is what is mathematically true, and there is
> > what people believe is mathematically true, and these
> > can be two different things.
There is everything about your life, and there is everything about your
life that you remember, and these can be two different things. What's
your point?
> > While people believe in RSA, then it will to some
> > extent still work.
> >
> > Except with people like me, who, if it's easy to work
> > out, can now use the surrogate factoring theorem and
> > factor really big numbers.
How? You've have NEVER explained this aspect, at least not since you've
posted the SF Theorem.
--- Christopher Heckman
> James, do you really believe that the theorem is useful
> or not? If you think that it's likely useful, why have
> you resisted all temptation to actually use it? Factor
> some big numbers and *then* you'll have money and attention.
>
> Until then, it's just odd to complain that no one cares
> about your theorem that might be useful.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- References:
- JSH: What's happening now?
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- JSH: What's happening now?
- Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by Date: Re: Social forces, that strong?
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: What's happening now?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
