Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (W. Mueckenheim)
- Date: 11 Apr 2005 05:11:42 -0700
Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:<ITSnetNOTcom#virgil-9BE167.17030809042005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> >
> > 1/2^n is a typical term of the sequence. No term of the sequence "over
> > all n e N" is equal to the limit.
> > Why should the above sum over all k e N be equal to the limit?
>
> Because for every positive real epsilon, there is a positive integer m
> such that whenever n >= m then |1 - SUM_{1<=k=<n, 1/2^2| < epsilon.
Whenever n > m means, it must be calculaed for ALL n > m. But a sum
over all n > m is an infinite sum. This ust be calculaed in order to
prove that a limit exists. I.e., it must be possible to calculate it
in advance.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):
Loading