Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (W. Mueckenheim)
- Date: 13 Apr 2005 04:12:11 -0700
richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin) wrote in message news:<d3e1jn$2udj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> In article <fb701d3c.0504110456.5298f0df@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> W. Mueckenheim <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >It talks about "ALL n" > n_0. Do you think "ALL n" supply a finite sum?
>
> Yes. For all n, the sum is finite, because all for all n, n is finite.
That's why I said that
SUM 1/2^k < 1
k e N
I is not important, how many of the terms 1/2^k may come along. W know
for sure that each of them is > 0, so that 1 - 1/2^k remains strictly
< 1.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):