Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Apr 2005 10:09:31 -0700
W. Mueckenheim wrote:
> Matt Gutting <tchrmatt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:<1113407805.35ff7c5732969e553e78fdf11ff07f5b@teranews>...
>
> Correct. But could you explain the difference between "all n are
> included in at least one of the sums" and "at least one of the sums
> includes ALL n". I can't see any.
Nice of you to encapsulate your error like this - I suspect that at
least 98% of the Cantor-was-wrong nonsense that permeates sci.math
comes down to the same simple error: an inability to understand why
swapping quantifiers matters.
Can you see any difference between the following statements:
a. Everyone has at least one mother
b. There is a mother somewhere whose children include everyone
(including herself, I suppose)
Brian Chandler
http://imaginatorium.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: max-min problem
- Next by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):