Re: abundance of irrationals!)

From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Apr 2005 05:56:55 -0700

Hi,

No, that is not the case. What you are calling "axioms", the
non-logical axioms, are actually theorems, of tautology, and the
excluded middle.

Here's what I'm worried about: Andy.

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.logic/search?group=sci.logic&q=Andy

Oh wait, I _am_ Andy.

Goedel says so!

With warm regards,

Ross

.

References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: r.e.s.
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: David Kastrup
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
  - From: Franziska Neugebauer

Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
Next by Date: how to deal with the algebra problem?
Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread