Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Apr 2005 10:43:33 -0700
Randy Poe wrote:
> W. Mueckenheim wrote:
> > Please repeat your proof
> > for the infinite Sum 1/2^k = 1, and you will see where you fail.
>
> The definition of this infinite sum is a sequence, and
> you said "sequences cause no problems".
Sigh. The definition of this infinite sum is the
LIMIT of a sequence, as I stated correctly here:
> By definition, S is the limit of the sequence S_1, S_2,
> ... where S_n = sum(k=1,n) 1/2^k.
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: W. Mueckenheim
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):