Re: JSH: Three major results

From: "Proginoskes" <proginoskes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Apr 2005 12:24:04 -0700

David C. Ullrich wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005 17:35:24 -0700, jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >Now I have three major results that I routinely
> >discuss:
> >
> >1. The proof of a problem with the current understanding
> >of the ring of algebraic integers, which if certain sci.math
> >posters are right, refutes a famous claim by Dedekind,
>
> No, that's a famous _theorem_ of Dedekind.

There's no point in arguing with the terminology; JSH thinks a theorem
and a claim are the same.
--- Christopher Heckman

.

References:
- JSH: Three major results
  - From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Three major results
  - From: David C . Ullrich

Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Three major results
Next by Date: Re: Testing for product of Gaussians
Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Three major results
Next by thread: Re: Three major results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: JSH: Three major results
... refutes a famous claim by Dedekind, which forms the basis for the ... The problem is with your understanding, ... allow the possibility that there is nothing to my research, but my position is still that of a "crank" as math society is using social tools to hold off the truth. ... mathematicians at my level ever born. ...
(sci.math)
Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
... years be reposted to this forum? ... one from, if I remember correctly, Dedekind) ... you and david cant both be correct since you state ... and as said before apparantly david c ullrich does ...
(sci.math)