Re: JSH: Three major results

In article <1113784523.980560.285210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Now I have three major results that I routinely discuss:
>
> 1. The proof of a problem with the current understanding of the ring
> of algebraic integers, which if certain sci.math posters are right,
> refutes a famous claim by Dedekind, which forms the basis for the
> theory of ideals, so basically, I've shot down the theory of ideals.

Complete bull***, as everyone knows.

> 2. My prime counting function which uses a constrained partial
> difference equation, which has a partial differential equation analog,
> and can explain the connection between the discrete count of prime
> numbers and continuous functions like Li(x), and it might even help to
> disprove the Riemann Hypothesis (or prove it as I'm not sure on that
> one).

Rehash of some twohundred year old ideas, with a lot of complete
bull*** added.

> 3. The Surrogate Factoring Theorem (SFT) which shows how to link
> factors of different integers through use of rationals.

Which shows that if you make enough stupid guesses about the factors of
a small number, then sometimes you guess right. Produces a method for
factoring that is completely useless.

> All of my results force major paradigm shifts.
>
> They all force you to think outside the box, as they say.

Seems like you are forced to think outside a padded cell.


> In the distant past we were called wizards.
>
> Today, I say those of my order are scientists.
>
> I am a scientist.

Bull*** artist != scientist.
.

Quantcast