Re: abundance of irrationals!)

imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in message news:<1113840031.725545.200050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...

> It's not really an insult, is it? You really are being immensely dim.
> (And this has nothing to do with "points of view": you can quite
> happily say "I do not wish to discuss sets that are not finite", and
> exit the discussion with grace.)

I do wish to talk about sets that are infinite because it can be shown
that they are not at all.

I said: there is a sum over all n.
You said: there is none.
I said: which n is excluded.
You are incapable of naming on, but continue you insult.
A very dishonest behaviour.

> If you can't do that, we can assume there's something wrong with your
> "logic".

Not with mine, but with yours. See where your example fails:

1) A n e N : E k e Z : k < n.
2) E k e Z : A n e N : k < n

Regards, WM
.

Quantcast