Re: Basic set question
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:33:59 -0400, Hanford Carr wrote:
> Dave Seaman wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:03:04 -0400, Hanford Carr wrote:
>> > agapito6314@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> ... snip
>> > A has two 1's in it. IMHO A is a list not a set.
>> It's stated right up front that A is a set.
> Abe Lincoln once asked his cabinet-- If I call this cow's tail a leg how
> many legs does this cow have? They answered 5 legs. Abe said no it
> doesn't matter what you call the tail it still has four legs.
I think Lincoln's example involved a dog, not a cow, but it looks like
you have made my point for me. Calling a set a list does not make it
one.
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic set question
- From: Hanford Carr
- Re: Basic set question
- References:
- Basic set question
- From: agapito6314
- Re: Basic set question
- From: Hanford Carr
- Re: Basic set question
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Basic set question
- From: Hanford Carr
- Basic set question
- Prev by Date: Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?
- Next by Date: Re: start me off (again) #3b
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic set question
- Next by thread: Re: Basic set question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|