Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral
thanks for the idea Torsten. is this a good approach to use even when b
has zeros near the boundary? what kind of scheme is typically used for
the integration?
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Sum with Moebius function and the Riemann zeta function
... we get here exponentials and how we can use here theta function ... i think you may not even need the theta identity ... the inverse of the zeros of the zeta are poles ...
(sci.math) - Re: Sum with Moebius function and the Riemann zeta function
... we get here exponentials and how we can use here theta function ... i think you may not even need the theta identity ... the inverse of the zeros of the zeta are poles ...
(sci.math) - Re: Sum with Moebius function and the Riemann zeta function
... where the sum on the right-hand side runs over all non-trivial zeros ... a common theta function identity gives you the equation ...
(sci.math) - Re: Sum with Moebius function and the Riemann zeta function
... we get here exponentials and how we can use here theta function ... the inverse of the zeros of the zeta are poles ... there is a residue product formula that you need to use ...
(sci.math) - Re: explicit versus implicit method for the heat equation
... Many people are solving the one-dimensional heat (diffusion) equation using central finite differences in space and forward Euler in time. ... To be able to take larger time steps, some people therefore use the implicit backward Euler scheme. ... However, as both time integration methods are first order methods, and the error of the full numerical scheme is ... I am wondering if putting much effort in using the backward Euler scheme has much sense. ...
(sci.math.num-analysis) |
|
