Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:20:43 GMT
In article <fb701d3c.0504270601.26dfc1e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (W. Mueckenheim) writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
....
> > >> > What about the length of all Euclidean parallels?
> > >>
> > >> Where is the natural number in that?
> > >
> > > The length, measuerd in meters.
> >
> > Euclidean lines don't have endpoints, so you can't measure them.
>
> You can start to do so.
Yup, you can start. Can you tell is when you are finished?
> And if set theorry is applied, you can answer
> my question.
No.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: Types of functions and relations
- Next by Date: Re: Types of functions and relations
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):
