Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: "Mike H" <mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:46:20 -0400
Many objects can be perceived or considered at once, and this is the
foundation for the concept of "set." Other than a mark on paper, what, then,
is the empty set?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: Rainer Rosenthal
- Phenomena and noumena
- From: Mike H
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: Ioannis
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: examachine
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: Hero
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: fishfry
- Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- Prev by Date: Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality
- Next by Date: rank & eigenvalues
- Previous by thread: Good reduction of Jacobians of twisted Fermat curves
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- Index(es):
