Re: SF: National security
On 27 Apr 2005 16:42:06 -0700, rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> will be sitting in front of some people asking you some very hard
>> questions.
> >
> >
> James Harris
>You are a loony.
,while SFT is not verified to work cut sci.crypt from replies. It's
current state belongs to other groups than sci.crypt.
Juuso
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
... what will James Harris do next? ... > The SFT can't be refuted. ... as far as producing useful factors, the techinques in the ... theorem are no better than picking possible factors at random. ...
(sci.crypt) - Re: SF: Some basic facts
... > First off, I have the surrogate factoring theorem, also known as the ... > SFT, which is a theorem. ... I have the James Harris is a Crank theorem, also known as the JHiaC, ...
(sci.crypt) - Re: JSH: A theorem cant be wrong
... > So the surrogate factoring theorem (SFT) cannot be wrong. ... > I like pushing away from the factoring problem to focus on the SFT ... there is the perfection of a ... > James Harris ...
(sci.crypt) - Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
... Lits O'Hate wrote: ... what will James Harris do next? ... The SFT can't be refuted. ... Well, if so, it'd be pure math, then, now wouldn't it. ...
(sci.crypt) |
|
