Re: SF: National security
- From: Juuso Hukkanen <juuso929@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:15:54 +0300
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:23:57 -0400, "Tim Peters" <tim.one@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>impossible to follow. The only thing you'll accomplish by adding mindlessly
>repetitive replies is increase "his threads'" message counts -- which is
My standard replies will be done in a minute. He is the one taking a
risk; perhaps someone else will also start to repeat with standard
replies, then the SFT thread mess becomes quickly complete. Standard
replies are terrible boring.
D:\>JSH
'JSH' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
D:\>SFT
'SFT' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Ok, this is an experimental trick I wonder for how long posters will
want to try to have an intellect conversation with two weirdoes - one
who repeats SFT like a parrot - and an another who gives standard
error messages like a parrot.
>what he wants. He rarely pays attention to what anyone else writes, he
>seems to get off on just that there _are_ replies.
Well, then I guess he will soon be in ecstasy. Or at least he will
have to learn to become happy with a larger amount of boring syntax
error messages:
D:\>JSH
'JSH' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
D:\>SFT
'SFT' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
The trick is that constant off topic announcements reduce anyone's
interest to seriously talk about SFT in favor for replying to off
topic thing. But there are other benefits too. likely he will soon
have to choose between SFT development and sci.crypt. I am sorry for
the annoyance my posts are / will be causing.
Btw. can that you said be interpreted that if no one would reply to
his threads , then he would be non-happy - and people here reply to
his threads just for crating him some weird satisfaction. That's weird
- perhaps.
Juuso
ps. I am a spammer - and this must be the strangest advertisement
campaign in the history of advertisement.
.
- References:
- Re: SF: National security
- From: Juuso Hukkanen
- Re: SF: National security
- From: Tim Peters
- Re: SF: National security
- Prev by Date: Re: Point in a sphere
- Next by Date: Re: SF: Symmetry, practical matters, social realities
- Previous by thread: Re: SF: National security
- Next by thread: Re: SF: National security
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
