Re: good text for linear algebra?



In article <d4qu1d$pe1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dave Rusin <rusin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>In article <f14f9$42708b36$d468cfd2$12701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>Willem H. de Boer <wdeboer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>Definitely Sheldon Axler's book. His approach is to teach linear algebra
>>via linear transformations on vector spaces; it's not until the later
>>chapters
>>that he introduces matrices (as representations of linear transformations
>>after a choice of basis). Also, the chapter on eigenvalues comes before
>>his chapter on determinants!

>The fact that you think an exclamation mark belongs here is symptomatic
>of the prevailing mentality that Axler wants to overcome.
>Eigenvalues (and singular values for that matter) are much more
>central to the ideas of linear algebra than the existence of a
>multiplicative map M_n(R) --> R .

>My experience with determinants and eigenvalues is akin to my experience
>with integrals and antiderivatives. We all go through Riemann sums and
>whatnot to explain what integrals _are_. Five minutes after having
>shown students the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, none of them can
>distinguish integrals from antiderivatives any more, and they will
>tell you that e.g. \int_R exp(-x^2) dx "can't be done". So too with
>eigenvalues. Sample question: ask them to compute the eigenvalues of a
>diagonal matrix (after they've seen that eigenvalues _may_ be computed as
>roots of det(A-XI) ). Do you really think they understand what
>eigenvalues _are_ any more?

This suggests that Axler's approach is doomed, despite his
laudable intentions, since eventually the students will get to that
chapter on determinants.

Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada







.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The group GL_3(2)
    ... > Van Jacques wrote: ... >> I did look at Jordan canonical form, diagonalizing, nilpotent ... if a 2x2 matrix has the same eigenvalues ... I took some undergrad course in linear algebra in the 60s at UCLA, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?
    ... His approach is to teach linear algebra ... >that he introduces matrices (as representations of linear transformations ... Eigenvalues are much more ... whatnot to explain what integrals _are_. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: why does professor david c ullrich have to put people down to feel good about himself?
    ... I already know about eigenvalues. ... call lambda an eigenvalue (my old linear algebra ... teacher abbreviated this "eit" for some strange ... David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Definition of singular values of an operator
    ... the same multiplicity, of course). ... for any square matrices A and B, the eigenvalues ... See e.g. the thread "Linear algebra" from July 2004 ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Motivation behind Functional Anaylsis and/or Lebesgue Integral
    ... space help us understand functions or integrals? ... looking for the initial motivation for Banach spaces I think, ... Among them, successive approximations to fixed ... not have spectral representation (compact ones may not have eigenvalues or ...
    (sci.math)