Re: abundance of irrationals!)


Virgil wrote:
> In article <1114704124.060097.18570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > *** T. Winter wrote:
> > > In article <fb701d3c.0504270601.26dfc1e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (W. Mueckenheim) writes:
> > > > David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > > >> > What about the length of all Euclidean parallels?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Where is the natural number in that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The length, measuerd in meters.
> > > > >
> > > > > Euclidean lines don't have endpoints, so you can't measure
them.
> >
> > > >
> > > > You can start to do so.
> > >
> > > Yup, you can start. Can you tell us when you are finished?
> >
> > Perhaps shortly after Cantor will have finished his diagonal?
>
> When one creates a rule which covers all cases, one has "finished",

a rule like that:
>>>0.1;
>>>0.10; 0.11;
>>>0.001; 0.101; 0.011; 0.111;
>>>...

Regards, WM

.

Quantcast