Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- From: Ed van der Meulen <ameulen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:13:16 EDT
We have to code software to check math "proofs". That is a huge job. You know software like maple for instance. But there are more.
Mathematics grows very fast with each time new notions. I think checking math "proofs" comes always behind.
You can code also in a not mathematical way. That is only shifting in the computer. And that are the only notions then. And then you can proof better things. But what is a full proof checking tool?
I am fond of the people who want to be more critical. They belong to our group.
Mathematics is surely great. But there are sciences as well. And that is not the same. There's quite some distance.
Spelling is grammar dependent and what are reliable grammer programs.
Please have a nice day
ed
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- References:
- Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- Prev by Date: Re: Conditionally convergent series
- Next by Date: Re: Shift operator in l^2
- Previous by thread: Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- Next by thread: Re: Computer checking of math "proofs"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|