Re: Phenomena and noumena
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
On 29 Apr 2005 10:22:47 -0700, Hero wrote:
> What about the fact, that the empty set is a proper subset of any set ?
Except one.
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Phenomena and noumena
- From: Hero
- Re: Phenomena and noumena
- References:
- Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- From: Mike H
- Phenomena and noumena
- From: Mike H
- Re: Phenomena and noumena
- From: Hero
- Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?
- Prev by Date: Re: Aleph-7 (?)
- Next by Date: Re: need help :(
- Previous by thread: Re: Phenomena and noumena
- Next by thread: Re: Phenomena and noumena
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
