Re: Phenomena and noumena

Dave, did You think of the empty set as being the exception ? Now, no
set is a proper subset of itself, so this must be an exception, which
don't exists.
Hero

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Phenomena and noumena
    ... > set is a proper subset of itself, so this must be an exception, which ... The empty set is the exception. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
    ... Dave wrote: ... Every member of the empty set is a number. ... that the empty set is a proper subset of any other set? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
    ... Dave wrote: ... >Every member of the empty set is a number. ... that the empty set is a proper subset of any other set? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The nature of the mathematical set
    ... to be saying (or implying) that a set has only one subset, ... every set (with one exception) has more than one subset. ... definition of a subset (proper subset) does not have a set as its own ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
    ... >>You're making too much of Infobahn's little joke, Dave. ... My apologies. ... I'm used to ignoring spelling because ... > exception. ...
    (sci.crypt)
Quantcast